Back to Learn

AI Benchmarks

How we measure and compare AI performance

What Are AI Benchmarks?

Benchmarks are standardized tests that measure AI capabilities. They help compare different models, track progress over time, and identify strengths and weaknesses.

Take With Caution

Benchmarks measure specific tasks. High scores don't mean an AI is "smarter" overall—and models often train specifically to do well on benchmarks.

Common LLM Benchmarks

MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding)

57 academic subjects from elementary to professional level. Tests general knowledge.

HumanEval

Programming problems that test code generation ability.

GSM8K

Grade school math word problems. Tests mathematical reasoning.

HellaSwag

Sentence completion that requires commonsense reasoning.

TruthfulQA

Questions designed to test whether models produce truthful answers vs. plausible-sounding falsehoods.

Human-Comparative Tests

  • Bar Exam — GPT-4 scored 90th percentile
  • SAT — Top models score near-perfect
  • Medical licensing exams — Passing scores on USMLE
  • AP exams — High scores on various subjects

Benchmark Leaderboards

  • Chatbot Arena — Human preference rankings through blind comparisons
  • Open LLM Leaderboard — Hugging Face benchmark aggregation
  • LMSYS — Crowdsourced model comparisons

Problems with Benchmarks

  • Data contamination — Models may have seen test questions in training
  • Gaming — Companies optimize specifically for benchmark scores
  • Narrow focus — Real-world tasks are more complex than benchmarks
  • Saturation — Models near-perfect on many old benchmarks
  • Bias — Benchmarks reflect their creators' assumptions

What Benchmarks Can't Measure

  • Creativity and originality
  • Common sense in real situations
  • Emotional intelligence
  • Long-term reasoning
  • Practical usefulness

Summary

  • • Benchmarks are standardized tests for comparing AI models
  • • Common benchmarks: MMLU, HumanEval, GSM8K, TruthfulQA
  • • Problems: data contamination, gaming, narrow focus
  • • Real-world usefulness is harder to measure than benchmark scores